Struggling to grasp the brilliance of Anton Chekhov’s The Proposal? Dive into our comprehensive guide tailored for Class 10 students. From a detailed summary and central idea to in-depth character sketches of Ivan Lomov, Natalya, and Chubukov, we cover it all! Explore key themes, analysis, textbook exercises, and the ten most important questions to ace your exams. Whether you’re looking for NCERT solutions or engaging speaking and writing tips, this guide has you covered. Perfect for mastering Chapter 11 of First Flight!
- Summary of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
- Central Idea of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
- Themes of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
- Character Sketches of Main Characters in The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
- Analysis of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
- Word Meaning of The Proposal
- Question Answers of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
- Thinking about the Language (Textbook Exercise The Proposal)
- Speaking and Writing
Summary of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
Anton Chekhov’s one-act play, The Proposal, is a comedic portrayal of marriage negotiations between neighbours. Ivan Lomov, a hypochondriac landowner, visits his neighbour, Stepan Stepanovich Chubukov, to propose to his daughter, Natalya Stepanovna.
The Proposal and Conflicts
Chubukov warmly welcomes Lomov and eagerly supports the idea of his daughter marrying him. However, when Lomov speaks to Natalya, they begin arguing over Oxen Meadows, a piece of disputed land. Their squabble escalates, turning the proposal into a chaotic debate. Chubukov joins the fray, deepening the conflict.
Resolution and a Second Argument
Lomov leaves in frustration, but Chubukov reveals his true intention to Natalya. Shocked to learn about the proposal, she insists on Lomov’s return. When he does, a second argument erupts over whose dog is superior—Lomov’s Guess or Natalya’s Squeezer.
The Clumsy Conclusion
Lomov, overwhelmed by excitement and his poor health, faints. Believing him dead, the Chubukovs panic. When Lomov revives, Chubukov hurriedly announces their engagement to avoid further disputes. Ironically, the couple continues arguing, hinting at future conflicts.
Central Idea of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
The Absurdity of Human Nature
Chekhov’s play highlights the absurdities of human behaviour. The central idea revolves around how trivial matters overshadow important decisions. Lomov visits Chubukov with a significant purpose: to propose to Natalya. Yet, petty disagreements over land and dogs derail his intentions.
Marriage as a Transaction
Chekhov critiques the view of marriage as a social or financial arrangement rather than a union of love. The characters focus on ownership, pride, and winning arguments rather than understanding one another.
The Satire of Society
By portraying Lomov as a hypochondriac and the Chubukovs as quarrelsome, the play mocks societal norms. Chekhov uses humour to expose how superficial concerns often mask genuine emotions, making marriage an ironic blend of romance and rivalry.
Themes of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
Materialism and Pride
Ownership of Oxen Meadows and pride in their dogs reveal the characters’ materialistic priorities. Their obsession with possessions highlights human pettiness.
The Complexity of Relationships
The play depicts relationships marked by conflict and misunderstanding. Lomov’s health, Natalya’s stubbornness, and Chubukov’s interference create chaos, showing the complexity of human bonds.
Satire and Farce
Chekhov uses satire to expose societal flaws, turning a marriage proposal into a farcical battle. The exaggerated arguments and overblown emotions create a humorous yet critical reflection of society.
Health and Hypochondria
Lomov’s constant complaints about his health underline the comedic tension. His physical and emotional frailty mirrors the fragile nature of human relationships.
Character Sketches of Main Characters in The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
Character Sketch of Ivan Vassilevitch Lomov
Ivan Lomov, a 35-year-old landowner, is a mix of nervousness and absurdity. His hypochondria makes him excessively conscious of his health, often imagining grave ailments. Lomov visits the Chubukovs with the serious intent of proposing to Natalya. However, his insecurities and short temper derail his plans.
He is argumentative, obsessing over petty issues like Oxen Meadows and dog superiority. Despite his intentions to marry, he struggles to maintain focus on his goal. Lomov’s lack of composure underlines his immaturity and inability to prioritise effectively. Yet, he is genuine in his desire for marriage, making him a relatable and comedic figure.
Character Sketch of Natalya Stepanovna
Natalya, the 25-year-old daughter of Chubukov, is described as an “excellent housekeeper” but is also stubborn and quarrelsome. She initially remains oblivious to Lomov’s proposal and becomes engrossed in arguing over trivial matters like land ownership and dogs.
Her pride and competitive nature often overshadow her warmth and intelligence. When she learns about Lomov’s intentions, her emotions take a sharp turn, showcasing her eagerness for marriage. Natalya’s personality reflects the complexities of human behaviour, where pride and affection coexist.
Character Sketch of Stepan Stepanovich Chubukov
Chubukov, Natalya’s father, is a practical and slightly opportunistic character. Initially, he appears cordial and welcoming towards Lomov, encouraging the marriage proposal. However, his temper flares up during arguments, revealing his combative nature.
Chubukov is a satirical representation of parental involvement in marriage negotiations. His hasty declaration of Lomov and Natalya’s engagement amidst chaos highlights his desire to secure his daughter’s future while avoiding prolonged disputes.
Despite his flaws, Chubukov adds comic relief, playing the dual role of a supportive father and an instigator in conflicts.
Analysis of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
Introduction
Anton Chekhov’s The Proposal is a one-act farcical comedy that delves into human absurdities. The play, written in the late 19th century, critiques societal norms, particularly the transactional nature of marriage. Through exaggerated conflicts and humour, Chekhov explores themes of pride, materialism, and the fragility of relationships.
Characters and Their Interactions in The Proposal
The three main characters—Lomov, Natalya, and Chubukov—are flawed yet relatable, representing various aspects of human nature. Lomov’s hypochondria symbolises vulnerability, while Natalya’s stubbornness reflects human pride. Chubukov, as a meddlesome parent, amplifies the chaos, adding to the play’s comedic essence. Their interactions are marked by petty disputes, underscoring the triviality of their concerns.
The dialogues, often exaggerated, reveal the characters’ priorities. Lomov’s inability to express his feelings, Natalya’s competitive nature, and Chubukov’s opportunism highlight the conflicts that arise from miscommunication and misplaced values.
Themes and Satirical Elements in The Proposal
Chekhov critiques the institution of marriage, portraying it as a transaction influenced by materialism and social expectations. The disputes over Oxen Meadows and the superiority of dogs overshadow the central event, turning the proposal into a ridiculous episode.
The play’s satire lies in its ability to mock societal norms without being overtly critical. The humour derived from Lomov’s health complaints and the characters’ exaggerated reactions makes the commentary subtle yet effective. Chekhov’s use of farce brings out the absurdity of focusing on trivial issues while ignoring significant matters like love and compatibility.
Structure and Language in The Proposal
The play’s one-act structure ensures a tight narrative, with no unnecessary digressions. Chekhov’s language is simple yet impactful, relying on irony and wit to convey his message. The conflicts escalate quickly, maintaining the audience’s engagement.
Conclusion
The Proposal is a timeless piece that uses humour to reflect human folly. Chekhov’s sharp observation of human behaviour and his ability to turn mundane events into comedic spectacles make the play a masterpiece. It serves as both entertainment and a critique of societal priorities, leaving audiences amused and contemplative.
Word Meaning of The Proposal
| Words/Expressions | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Hypochondriac | A person who always worries about their health and thinks they are sick when they are not. |
| Oxen Meadows | A piece of land over which Lomov and the Chubukovs argue. |
| A marriageable age | The age at which a person is considered suitable for marriage. |
| Claptrap | Nonsense or meaningless talk. |
| Palpitations | Strong, fast, or irregular heartbeats caused by excitement or anxiety. |
| Perpetuity | Forever or for an unlimited amount of time. |
| Insuperable | Impossible to overcome or deal with. |
| Pettifogger | A person who argues about unimportant details or behaves in a silly, quarrelsome way. |
| Land-grabber | Someone who takes land unfairly or greedily. |
| Inheritance | Property or money received from someone after they die. |
| Pardon the intrusion | An expression used to apologise for interrupting someone. |
| Confounded | An old-fashioned word for being annoyed or frustrated. |
| It’s immaterial | It doesn’t matter or isn’t important. |
| My heart’s giving out | Feeling like one’s heart is failing due to stress or fear. |
| And there’s an end to it | Used to express finality, meaning no more discussion is needed. |
| Squeezer | The name of Natalya’s dog, used during the argument about which dog is better. |
| Croaked | An informal way to say someone died (in the play, used jokingly about Lomov). |
| Hysterics | A fit of uncontrollable laughter, crying, or emotions. |
| Bequeathed | Left something to someone in a will after death. |
Question Answers of The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
1. What does Chubukov at first suspect that Lomov has come for? Is he sincere when he later says, “And I’ve always loved you, my angel, as if you were my own son”?
Chubukov initially suspects Lomov has come to borrow money. His later statement seems insincere as he quickly turns argumentative during the quarrels, showing that his affection is conditional and superficial.
2. Chubukov says of Natalya: “… as if she won’t consent! She’s in love; egad, she’s like a lovesick cat…” Would you agree?
Yes, Natalya shows clear affection for Lomov after learning about his proposal. Her sudden change in behaviour and eagerness for his return indicate her romantic feelings, though masked by her quarrelsome nature.
3. (i) Find all the words and expressions in the play that the characters use to speak about each other, and the accusations and insults they hurl at each other.
- Lomov about Natalya: “Excellent housekeeper,” “not bad-looking,” “well-educated.”
- Lomov about Chubukov: “Intriguer,” “old rat.”
- Natalya about Lomov: “Land-grabber,” “pettifogger.”
- Chubukov about Lomov: “Hypochondriac,” “malicious, double-faced intriguer.”
- Chubukov about Natalya: “Lovesick cat,” “scold.”
(ii) Five adjectives or adjectival expressions to describe each character:
- Lomov: Nervous, argumentative, indecisive, hypochondriac, well-meaning.
- Natalya: Stubborn, proud, emotional, affectionate, quarrelsome.
- Chubukov: Opportunistic, hot-tempered, manipulative, comical, superficial.
(iii) Can you now imagine what these characters will quarrel about next?
They might argue over trivial domestic matters, such as household expenses, the behaviour of their pets, or even Lomov’s health issues. Their inability to prioritise peace makes future conflicts inevitable.
Ten Most Important Questions from The Proposal
1. What is the central conflict in “The Proposal”?
The central conflict revolves around Lomov’s awkward attempt to propose to Natalya, which gets derailed by petty arguments about land ownership and their dogs, revealing their stubborn and materialistic natures.
2. How do Lomov and Natalya behave when they are arguing?
Lomov and Natalya become highly emotional, irrational, and combative during their arguments. They hurl insults and refuse to compromise, prioritising their pride over reason.
3. What is the role of Chubukov in the play?
Chubukov acts as a mediator and instigator. While he supports Lomov’s proposal initially, he later fuels the arguments, adding to the chaos and satire of human vanity.
4. Why does Lomov keep getting distracted during his proposal?
Lomov is easily distracted by his nervousness and insecurities, which escalate into unnecessary arguments. His poor health, including palpitations, further complicates his attempts.
5. How does the play satirize the upper class of Russian society?
The play mocks the upper class by highlighting their obsession with wealth, property, and appearances. Lomov and Natalya’s trivial quarrels show how shallow and self-serving their concerns are.
6. What is the significance of the arguments over the dogs and the land?
These arguments symbolise the pettiness and greed of the characters. Despite their mutual interest in marriage, they prioritise material possessions over their relationship.
7. How does the play end, and what does it suggest about the characters’ future?
The play ends with Lomov and Natalya agreeing to marry, but their constant bickering suggests that their future will be full of similar conflicts, reflecting their flawed personalities.
8. What is the author’s tone in the play?
The tone is light-hearted and satirical, blending humour with critique to expose the absurdities of human behaviour and societal norms.
9. How does the play use humour to highlight the characters’ flaws?
The humour arises from exaggerated arguments and contradictions. For example, Lomov’s health issues and the trivial disputes underscore his nervousness and the characters’ triviality.
10. What is the theme of the play?
The main theme is the absurdity of human relationships influenced by greed and ego. It explores the clash between love and materialism, showing how trivialities often overshadow meaningful connections.
Thinking about the Language (Textbook Exercise The Proposal)
1. Expressions or Ways of Speaking That Seem More Russian
In The Proposal, some expressions reflect Russian speech patterns and cultural norms:
| Russian-Like Expressions | Modern English Equivalents |
|---|---|
| “My darling” / “My treasure” | “My dear” / “Mate” (more casual in English) |
| “And there’s an end to it” | “That’s final!” |
| “Egad!” | “Good heavens!” / “Oh dear!” |
| “Pardon the intrusion” | “Sorry to interrupt” |
| “What a burden, Lord, to be alive!” | “Life is such a struggle!” |
These expressions highlight cultural differences, as Russian language often uses more emotive and affectionate terms.
2. Pronunciation of Words
| Word | Syllables | Stress | Pronunciation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palpitations | 4 | Third | pal-pi-ta-tions |
| Interfere | 3 | Third | in-ter-fere |
| Implore | 2 | Second | im-plore |
| Thoroughbred | 3 | First | tho-rough-bred |
| Pedigree | 3 | First | ped-i-gree |
| Principle | 3 | First | prin-ci-ple |
| Evidence | 3 | First | ev-i-dence |
| Misfortune | 3 | Second | mis-for-tune |
| Malicious | 3 | Second | ma-li-cious |
| Embezzlement | 4 | Second | em-bez-zle-ment |
| Architect | 3 | First | ar-chi-tect |
| Neighbours | 2 | First | neigh-bours |
| Accustomed | 3 | Second | ac-cus-tomed |
| Temporary | 4 | First | tem-po-ra-ry |
| Behaviour | 3 | Second | be-hav-iour |
| Documents | 3 | First | doc-u-ments |
3. Meaning and Use of Phrases
| Phrase | Meaning | Example Sentence |
|---|---|---|
| You may take it that | Assume or believe it to be true. | You may take it that she will agree to come. |
| He seems to be coming round | He is starting to recover or change his opinion. | After some rest, he seems to be coming round. |
| My foot’s gone to sleep | My foot has become numb or tingly. | I sat so long that my foot’s gone to sleep. |
II. Reported Speech
- To report a question, we use the reporting verb ask (as in Sentence Set 1).
- To report a statement, we use the reporting verb say or tell.
- The adverb of place here changes to there.
- When the verb in direct speech is in the present tense, the verb in reported speech is in the past tense (as in Sentence Set 3).
- If the verb in direct speech is in the present continuous tense, the verb in reported speech changes to past continuous tense. For example, is getting changes to was getting.
- When the sentence in direct speech contains a word denoting respect, we add the adverb respectfully in the reporting clause (as in Sentence Set 1).
- The pronouns I, me, our, and mine, which are used in the first person in direct speech, change according to the subject or object of the reporting verb, such as he, she, or they in reported speech.
III. Here is an excerpt from an article from the Times of India dated 27 August 2006. Rewrite it, changing the sentences in direct speech into reported speech. Leave the other sentences unchanged.
ANSWER:
90-year-old A. K. Hangal, one of Hindi cinema’s most famous character actors, laughed when asked about his age. He said, with humour, that if people knew how old he was, he wouldn’t get work. Despite his age, he seemed rather energetic.
When asked about the secret of his energy, he replied that his intake of everything was in small quantities and that he walked a lot. He mentioned that he had joined the industry when most people retire, in his 40s. He added that he didn’t miss being called a star and was still respected and given work, unlike many actors of his age who were living in poverty and without work. He stated that he had no complaints but admitted that he had always been underpaid.
Hangal, a recipient of the Padma Bhushan, never chased money or materialistic gains. He reflected that while he was content, money was indeed important. He regretted being a fool for not understanding the value of money earlier.
Speaking and Writing
ANSWER:
1. Anger Management
Three ill effects of anger:
- Strained relationships: Anger can hurt loved ones and damage trust.
- Poor decision-making: Acting impulsively when angry often leads to regret.
- Health issues: Persistent anger can lead to stress, high blood pressure, and heart problems.
Ways to avoid losing temper:
- Practice deep breathing or meditation to calm the mind.
- Take a short break to cool off before reacting.
- Reflect on whether the issue will matter in the long run.
Benefits of anger:
- It can highlight areas of injustice or personal boundaries that need addressing.
- Channelled correctly, it can motivate change and problem-solving.
2. Script Based on The Home and the World
Characters:
- Nikhil (The narrator)
- Bimala
Setting: A neatly arranged room, late afternoon.
Script:
[Nikhil enters the room, looking surprised.]
Nikhil: (pausing, observing) Bimala, this is unexpected. You called for me?
[Bimala fidgets with her bangles, avoiding his gaze.]
Bimala: Yes. Tell me, is it right that our market is the only one in Bengal selling foreign goods?
Nikhil: (raising an eyebrow) And what do you propose we do?
Bimala: (firmly) Order them out!
Nikhil: (calmly) But, Bimala, the goods aren’t mine.
Bimala: Isn’t the market yours? You can decide!
Nikhil: (sighing) It belongs more to those who trade there.
Bimala: (angrily) Then make them trade Indian goods!
Nikhil: (stepping closer, gently) I’d be delighted if they did, but forcing them? That’s not right.
[Bimala turns away, frustrated. Nikhil looks at her with a mixture of affection and concern.]
Nikhil: To force for the country’s sake is still tyranny, my dear. Please think about it.
[He exits, leaving Bimala deep in thought.]
3. Qualities in a Marriage Partner
Discussion Points:
Personal qualities:
- Appearance: While attraction matters, compatibility is key.
- Attitudes and beliefs: Shared values help build a strong relationship.
- Sense of humour: A good sense of humour fosters joy and eases challenges.
Value system:
- Compassion and kindness: These create a supportive partnership.
- Tolerance and ambition: Balance between acceptance and motivation is crucial.
- Attitude to money: Practicality and shared financial goals matter.
Education and professional background:
- Similar levels of education or understanding can lead to mutual respect and intellectual compatibility.
4. Romantic Comedy Scenes in the Play
The humorous arguments in The Proposal resemble scenes from romantic comedies. For instance, the heated yet trivial debate about Oxen Meadows could remind one of classic misunderstandings in films like Pride and Prejudice (2005) or 10 Things I Hate About You (1999).
In groups, one could recount specific moments where characters argue passionately but eventually find common ground, often leading to unexpected romance or resolution.
20 Multiple Choice Questions on The Proposal by Anton Chekhov
Pingback: Complete Guide to Understanding Each Chapter of First Flight - Solved Notes